Impact of different cultivation technologies on the growth and yield of watermelon
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31359/2413.7642.2026.1.373Keywords:
intensive and organic cultivation technologies, microbial preparations, plant biometric parameters, duration of interphase periodsAbstract
The aim of the study was to determine the effectiveness of organic and intensive watermelon cultivation technologies under the conditions of the Steppe zone of Ukraine. Field experiments were conducted on low-humus ordinary chernozem at the “Shchedryi Lan” farming enterprise in the Kramatorsk district of Donetsk region. The study evaluated the efficiency of implementing organic technology (application of poultry manure at 20 t/ha + incorporation of post-harvest green manure + foliar feeding with HelpRost Vegetable and HelpRost Boron + spraying with biopreparations Mycohelp and Actoverm) and intensive technology (N48P144K144 + foliar feeding with Avangard Vegetable and Avangard Boron + treatment with Uniform and Transform preparations). It was established that under the Steppe conditions of Ukraine, the initial growth stages of watermelon plants under organic technology proceeded more slowly compared to the intensive system (by 1–5 days), while technical maturity occurred 9 days earlier. Under the intensive cultivation system, plants exhibited the highest biometric parameters: main shoot length reached 118.5 cm, the number of lateral shoots was 6.8 per plant with a total length of 835 cm, the number of leaves was 69.5 per plant, and the number of fruits was 3.5 per plant. The organic cultivation system was significantly inferior in all biometric indicators. The application of intensive technology ensured the highest watermelon yield, averaging 83.3 t/ha over the years of study. Increasing the efficiency of organic approaches is possible only through the enhancement of cultivation technologies by additional applications of biopreparations aimed at optimizing plant nutrition.
References
Список використаних джерел
1. Книш В.І., Шабля О.С., Мельник С.Т. Безвідходна технологія вирощування кавуна на насіння. Аграрні інновації. 2023. 21. С. 35-42. https://doi.org/10.32848/agrar.innov.2023.21.5
2. Cич З.Д., Бобось І.М., Федосій І.О. Овочівництво: навч. посібник. Практикум. К.: ЦП «Копіцентр», 2018, 407 с.
3. Song X., Wang Q., Luo J., Guo D., Ma Y. Effect of Fertilizer Application on Watermelon Growth, Structure of Dissolved Organic Matter and Microbial Functional Diversity in Organic Substrates. Sustainability. 2022. 14. 6951. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14126951
4. Arias R.M. et al. Selection and characterization of phosphate-solubilizing fungi and their effects on coffee plantations. Plants. 2023. 12. 3395. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12193395
5. Ali A.M., Awad M.Y., Hegab S.A., Gawad A.M.A.E., Eissa M.A. Effect of potassium solubilizing bacteria (Bacillus cereus) on growth and yield of potato. J. Plant Nutr. 2021. 44. Р. 411-420. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2020.1822399
6. Park S., Kim A.L., Hong Y.K., Shin J.H., Joo S.H. A highly efficient auxin-producing bacterial strain and its effect on plant growth. J. Genet. Eng. Biotechnol. 2021. 19. 179. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43141-021-00252-w
7. Mushtaq Z., Nazir A., Asghar H.N., Zahir Z.A. Interactive effect of siderophore-producing bacteria and l-tryptophan on physiology, tuber characteristics, yield, and iron concentration of potato. Potato Res. 2022. 65. Р. 1015-1027. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11540-022-09565-w
8. Wang C. et al. Functional assembly of root-associated microbial consortia improves nutrient efficiency and yield in soybean. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2021. 63. Р. 1021-1035. https://doi.org/10.1111/jipb.13073
9. Walia A., Mehta P., Chauhan A., Shirkot C.K. Effect of Bacillus subtilis strain CKT1 as inoculum on growth of tomato seedlings under net house conditions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. India Sect. B Biol. Sci. 2014. 84. Р. 145-155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-013-0189-3
10. Abbou M., Chabbi M., Benicha M. Assessment of pesticide use by determination of environmental indicators: Case study of watermelon from Loukkos (Northwest Morocco). Euro-Mediterr. J. Environ. Integr. 2023. 8. Р. 463-480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41207-023-00386-y
11. Wang Z. et al. Promoting effects on watermelon and fermentation optimization of Plantibacter sp. WZW03. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2020. 39. Р. 970–980. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-019-10037-8
12. Zubair M. et al. Genetic screening and expression analysis of psychrophilic Bacillus spp. reveal their potential to alleviate cold stress and modulate phytohormones in wheat. Microorganisms. 2019. 7. 337. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7090337
13. Horuz S., Aysan Y. Biological control of watermelon seedling blight caused by Acidovorax citrulli using antagonistic bacteria from the genera Curtobacterium, Microbacterium and Pseudomonas. Plant Protect. Sci. 2018. 54(3). Р. 138-146. https://doi.org/10.17221/168/2016-PPS
14. Michelson A. E. et al. The Incidence and Economic Importance of the Entomofauna on the Growth and Production of Watermelon in Yagoua (Cameroon). Sustainable Agriculture Research. 2021. 10 (2). Р. 33-47. https://doi.org/10.5539/sar.v10n2p33
15. Wang B. et al. Watermelon responds to organic fertilizer by enhancing root-associated acid phosphatase activity to improve organic phosphorus utilization. Journal of Plant Physiology. 2022. 279. 153838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2022.153838.
16. Mejía-Guerra P.A. et al. Microbial biofertilizers and biopesticides from vermicompost tea and rhizosphere of organic soilless melon crop: In vitro assessment. Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology. 2025. 63. 103453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2024.103453
17. Zheng Х. et al. Long-term bioorganic and organic fertilization improved soil quality and multifunctionality under continuous cropping in watermelon. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 2024. 359. 108721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2023.108721.
18. Liu J. et al. Low Nitrogen Availability in Organic Fertilizers Limited Organic Watermelon Transplant Growth. Horticulturae. 2024. 10(11). 1140. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10111140
19. Wu Y. et al. Effects of Water and Nitrogen Coupling on Yield, Quality, and Water Use Efficiency of Drip-Irrigated Watermelon Under Organic Fertilizer Application. Horticulturae. 2026. 12(1). 105. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae12010105
20. Бондаренко Г.Л., Яковенко К.І. Методика дослідної справи в овочівництві і баштанництві. Харків: Основа, 2011. 369 с.
21. Convention on Biological Diversity. (1992, June). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_030#Text
REFERENCES
1. Knysh, V.I., Shablya, O.S., Melnyk, S.T. (2023). Waste-free technology of growing watermelon from seeds. Agrarian innovations, 21, 35-42. https://doi.org/10.32848/agrar.innov.2023.21.5
2. Sych, Z.D., Bobos, I.M., Fedosiy, I.O. (2008). Vegetable growing: a manual. Practical course. K.: CP "Kopitsentr", 407 р.
3. Song, X., Wang, Q., Luo, J., Guo, D., Ma, Y. (2022). Effect of Fertilizer Application on Watermelon Growth, Structure of Dissolved Organic Matter and Microbial Functional Diversity in Organic Substrates. Sustainability, 14, 6951. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14126951
4. Arias, R.M. et al. (2023). Selection and characterization of phosphate-solubilizing fungi and their effects on coffee plantations. Plants, 12, 3395. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12193395
5. Ali, A.M., Awad, M.Y., Hegab, S.A., Gawad, A.M.A.E., Eissa, M.A. (2021). Effect of potassium solubilizing bacteria (Bacillus cereus) on growth and yield of potato. J. Plant Nutr., 44, 411-420. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2020.1822399
6. Park, S., Kim, A.L., Hong, Y.K., Shin, J.H., Joo, S.H. (2021). A highly efficient auxin-producing bacterial strain and its effect on plant growth. J. Genet. Eng. Biotechnol., 19, 179. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43141-021-00252-w
7. Mushtaq, Z., Nazir, A., Asghar, H.N., Zahir, Z.A. (2022). Interactive effect of siderophore-producing bacteria and l-tryptophan on physiology, tuber characteristics, yield, and iron concentration of potato. Potato Res., 65, 1015-1027. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11540-022-09565-w
8. Wang, C. et al. (2021). Functional assembly of root-associated microbial consortia improves nutrient efficiency and yield in soybean. J. Integr. Plant Biol., 63, 1021-1035. https://doi.org/10.1111/jipb.13073
9. Walia, A., Mehta, P., Chauhan, A., Shirkot, C.K. (2014). Effect of Bacillus subtilis strain CKT1 as inoculum on growth of tomato seedlings under net house conditions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. India Sect. B Biol. Sci., 84, 145-155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-013-0189-3
10. Abbou, M., Chabbi, M., Benicha, M. (2023). Assessment of pesticide use by determination of environmental indicators: Case study of watermelon from Loukkos (Northwest Morocco). Euro-Mediterr. J. Environ. Integr., 8, 463-480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41207-023-00386-y
11. Wang, Z. et al. (2020). Promoting effects on watermelon and fermentation optimization of Plantibacter sp. WZW03. J. Plant Growth Regul., 39, 970–980. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-019-10037-8
12. Zubair, M. et al. (2019). Genetic screening and expression analysis of psychrophilic Bacillus spp. reveal their potential to alleviate cold stress and modulate phytohormones in wheat. Microorganisms, 7, 337. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7090337
13. Horuz, S., Aysan, Y. (2018). Biological control of watermelon seedling blight caused by Acidovorax citrulli using antagonistic bacteria from the genera Curtobacterium, Microbacterium and Pseudomonas. Plant Protect. Sci., 54(3), 138-146. https://doi.org/10.17221/168/2016-PPS
14. Michelson, A. E. et al. (2021). The Incidence and Economic Importance of the Entomofauna on the Growth and Production of Watermelon in Yagoua (Cameroon). Sustainable Agriculture Research., 10 (2), 33-47. https://doi.org/10.5539/sar.v10n2p33
15. Wang B., et al. (2022). Watermelon responds to organic fertilizer by enhancing root-associated acid phosphatase activity to improve organic phosphorus utilization. Journal of Plant Physiology, 279, 153838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2022.153838.
16. Mejía-Guerra, P.A. et al. (2025). Microbial biofertilizers and biopesticides from vermicompost tea and rhizosphere of organic soilless melon crop: In vitro assessment. Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology, 63, 103453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2024.103453
17. Zheng Х., et al. (2024). Long-term bioorganic and organic fertilization improved soil quality and multifunctionality under continuous cropping in watermelon. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 359, 108721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2023.108721.
18. Liu J., et al. (2024). Low Nitrogen Availability in Organic Fertilizers Limited Organic Watermelon Transplant Growth. Horticulturae, 10(11), 1140. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10111140
19. Wu Y. et al. (2026). Effects of Water and Nitrogen Coupling on Yield, Quality, and Water Use Efficiency of Drip-Irrigated Watermelon Under Organic Fertilizer Application. Horticulturae, 12(1), 105. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae12010105
20. Bondarenko, G.L., Yakovenko, K.I. (Ed). Methodology of research work in vegetable growing and melon growing. Kharkiv: Osnova, 2001. 369 р.
21. Convention on Biological Diversity. (1992, June). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_030#Text
