Bioenergy efficiency of growing indeterminant tomato hybrids in glass winter greenhouses
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31359/2413-7642-2025-2-160Keywords:
tomato, glass winter greenhouse, hybrids, variety-rootstock combinations, bioenergy efficiency coefficientAbstract
The aim of the study was to determine the bioenergetic efficiency of growing indeterminate tomato hybrids in glass winter greenhouses. The experimental research included three main directions: (1) selection of indeterminate tomato hybrids suitable for winter greenhouse conditions; (2) evaluation of the efficiency of scion–rootstock combinations in indeterminate hybrids; and (3) assessment of the influence of plant training methods on the productivity and bioenergetic efficiency of the Merlis F1 hybrid.
It was established that when cultivating indeterminate tomato hybrids in glass winter greenhouses, the major components of energy consumption are heating and electricity (63.0%) and labor costs (22.2%). The introduction of the Maximoto F1, Merlis F1, and Torero F1 hybrids increases the energy accumulated in the yield by 15.3–24.7% and raises the bioenergetic efficiency coefficient to 2.01–2.08. The use of scion–rootstock combinations (Merlis F1 and Torero F1 scions grafted onto Maxifort F1, TD-1 F1, and
Emperador F1 rootstocks) enhances the energy content of the yield by 11.5–22.6% (3.94–8.38 MJ/m²) and ensures a bioenergetic efficiency coefficient ranging from 2.15 to 2.55.
For the Merlis F1 hybrid, training plants into two stems (after the third cluster on every second plant in the slab and after the ninth cluster on every fourth plant) resulted in a significant increase in the energy accumulated in the yield (by 16.9%), providing a bioenergetic efficiency coefficient of 2.28. The proposed technological practices are recommended for implementation in greenhouse vegetable production systems in Ukraine.
References
1. Marx-Pienaar N.J.M.M., Erasmus A.C. Status consciousness and knowledge as potential impediments of household’s sustainable consumption practices of fresh produce amidst times of climate change. International Journal of Consumer Studies. 2014. 38(4). Р. 419-426. DOI: 10.1111/ijcs.12111.
2. Egea I., Estrada Y., Flores F.B., Bolarín M.C. Improving production and fruit quality of tomato under abiotic stress: Genes for the future of tomato breeding for a sustainable agriculture. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 2022. 204. Р. 105086. DOI: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2022.105086
3. Capobianco-Uriarte M. D. L. M., Aparicio J., De Pablo-Valenciano J., Casado-Belmonte M. D. P. The European tomato market. An approach by export competitiveness maps. PloS one. 2021. 16(5). e0250867
4. Popescu, A. Some considerations on vegetables and tomatoes production and consumption in Romania in the period 2007-2014. Scientific Papers Series Management, Economic Engineering in Agriculture & Rural Development. 2016. 16(3). Р. 277-284.
5. Jerca I.O., Smedescu C. A decade of change in europe’s tomato greenhouses: insights and trends. Scientific Papers Series Management, Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development. 2023. 23 (4). Р. 431-436.
6. Ilić Z. S., Kapoulas N., Šunić L. Tomato Fruit Quality from Organic and Conventional Production. InTech. 2014. DOI: 10.5772/58239
7. Branthome F.X. Worldwide (total fresh) tomato production in 2021. 2023. https://www.tomatonews.com. Accessed on 29.04.2024.
8. Parry M. A., Hawkesford M. J. Food security: increasing yield and improving resource use efficiency. Proceedings of the nutrition Society. 2010. 69(4). Р. 592-600
9. Iancu T., Petre I. L., Tudor V. C., Micu M. M., Ursu A., Teodorescu F. R., Dumitru E. A. A Difficult Pattern to Change in Romania, the Perspective of Socio-Economic Development. Sustainability. 2022. 14(4). 2350.
10. Maja M. M., Ayano S. F. The impact of population growth on natural resources and farmers’ capacity to adapt to climate change in low-income countries. Earth Systems and Environment. 2021. 5. Р. 271-283.
11. Pretty J. Agricultural sustainability: concepts, principles and evidence. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2008. 363(1491). Р. 447-465.
12. Becerril H., De los Rios I. Energy efficiency strategies for ecological greenhouses: experiences from Murcia (Spain). Energies. 2016. 9(11). Р. 866.
13. Peet M. M., Welles G. Greenhouse tomato production. In Tomatoes (pp. 257-304). Wallingford UK: CABI Publishing. 2005.
14. LaPlante G., Andrekovic S., Young R. G., Kelly J. M., Bennett N., Currie E. J., Hanner R. H. Canadian greenhouse operations and their potential to enhance domestic food security. Agronomy. 2021. 11(6). Р. 1229.
15. Pardossi A., Tognoni F., Incrocci L. Mediterranean greenhouse technology. Chronica horticulturae. 2004. 44(2). Р. 28-34.
16. Jaramillo N., Eliecer J., Sánchez L., Germán D., Rodríguez V., Aguilar P.A. et al. Tecnología para el cultivo de tomate bajo condiciones protegidas. CORPOICA, Bogotá, Colombia, 2012. 482 p.
17. Kumar B. Technical Standards for Naturally Ventilated, Fan & Pad Green House and Shade Net House. Ministry of Agriculture, Gurgaon, India. 2011.
18. Sato S., Peet M.M., Thomas J.F. Physiological factors limit fruit set of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) under chronic, mild heat stress. Plant Cell Environ. 2000. 23(7). Р. 719-726. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2000.00589.x
19. Van Ploeg D., Heuvelink E. Influence of sub-optimal temperature on tomato growth and yield: A review. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 2005. 80(6). Р. 652-659. DOI: 10.1080/14620316.2005.11511994
20. Alsamir M., Mahmood T., Trethowan R., Ahmad N. An overview of heat stress in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2021. 28(3). Р. 1654-1663. DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.11.088.
21. Jitpong P., Jannoi J., Sastawittaya W., Mega R., Chulaka P., Thussagunpanit J. Impact of greenhouse height on growth, physiological changes, and yield of two cherry tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum) cultivars. Thai J. Agric. Sci. 2025. 58(1). Р. 1-16.
22. Бондаренко Г.Л., Яковенко К.І. Методика дослідної справи в овочівництві і баштанництві. Харків: Основа, 2011. 369 с.
23. Дослідна справа в агрономії: навчальний посібник. в 2 кн. Книга 2. Статистична обробка результатів досліджень. / А.О. Рожков, В.К. Пузік, С.М. Каленська та ін. Харків: Мацдан, 2016. 314 с.
24. Djidonou D., Simonne A. H., Koch K. E., Brecht J. K., Zhao X. Nutritional Quality of Field-grown Tomato Fruit as Affected by Grafting with Interspecific Hybrid Rootstocks. HortScience. 2016. 51(12). Р. 1618–1624. DOI: 10.21273/HORTSCI11275-16.
25. Dorais M., Ehret D.L., Papadopoulos A.P. Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) health components: From the seed to the consumer Phytochem. Rev. 2008. 7. Р. 231-250.
26. Kabas A., Celik I. Effect of newly developed interspecific hybrid rootstocks on mineral nutrient composition and fruit quality in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Acta Alimentaria. 2021. 50(3). Р. 383-392. DOI: 10.1556/066.2021.00009
27. Djidonou D., Zhao X., Brecht J.K., Cordasco K.M. Influence of interspecific hybrid rootstocks on tomato growth, nutrient accumulation, yield, and fruit composition under greenhouse conditions. HortTechnology. 2017. 27(6). Р. 868–877.